<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Final Review Task Force Report
Danny and all assembly and NC members,
I don't think the DNSO GA should withdraw, but rather push harder
to be heard, or paid the respect that we as members deserve.
DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> The final report of the Review Task Force has been posted with new amendments
> by Phil Sheppard which grant even more powers to Council Task Forces at the
> expense of Working Groups:
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc06/msg00464.html
>
> This is an ongoing attack against this Assembly's full participation in the
> DNSO process. As usual, the positions of both the GA and the NCDNHC were
> cited and then disregarded.
>
> At this time, I would advocate having the GA withdraw from all Council
> activities until the working group process is respected. I request the views
> of the membership.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|