<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: DNSO NC TF on Structure-Discussion paper
How amusing to see Danny callin ga TF Chair to task for not acting
like a chair, when he himself is such a glaring example of how not to
be a chair.
Wednesday, Wednesday, December 12, 2001, 11:39:33 AM, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
> David Farrar wrote: "Please note it is not a position paper of the Taskforce
> but a paper drafted by the TF Chair as a starting point."
> I would ask why are we even discussing this paper if the Terms of Reference
> upon which it is predicated haven't even been voted upon by the members of
> this TF?
> I would also ask to see the record of the vote taken to ratify Phil Sheppard
> as the Chair of this TF. NC procedures state: (3.2) "In the case of a task
> force the NC typically chooses to ratify the election of a chair by the task
> force itself." So far, no vote has been held of which I am aware. Why?
> If the Chair has not been ratified and the Terms of Reference have not been
> voted upon, why are we then even bothering at this point to discuss Phil's
> opinions on the At-Large?
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Webcertificates.info
SSL Certificates for resellers from $49ea
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|