<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Out and In reach
Eric and all assembly members,
Eric Dierker wrote:
> Well over time I have figured what hurts GA progress and what helps it.
>
> Here are a list of inputs that help if they are responded to properly;
>
> Stupid Questions - are there really any?
> Requests for help - It is too bad but this usually is answered
> offlist, but response is wonderful.
I would like to see more of these on-list.
>
> Attacks on the BoD and Staff - ;-(
I prefer to use the term constructive criticism. The difference
is at times a matter of perception.
>
>
> What get Universally negative responses;
>
> edicts by the Staff,
> edicts by the BoD
> edicts by a WIPO decision
> spamming
>
> Not that helpful because they are viciously responded to negatively by a
> few;
>
> Requests from our chair.
> Requests from the NC
> Requests from the BoD
> Apparent violations of voting rules - which is quite interesting since
> we are consensus based.
Consensus must be measured to know it it exists. The GA is a
general assembly. It has a set of voting rules. They may need
correcting or improving. As a general assembly we VOTE on
issues, and candidates for various positions.
>
>
> During a four month period I tallied what my humble mind saw as attacks
> upon another.
>
> Attacks against participating members seem to be 3 times that of against
> outside groups or individuals.
>
> Personal attacks cause more to not participate than any other reason
> (fear of public writing aside)
One omission here. Blocking participation by silly rules is the single
biggest hindrance to participation.
>
>
> I think it would be safe to say that personal attacks are at the
> foundation of our inability to fund.
I would disagree somewhat here. The lack of proper openness
to participate is the single biggest hindrance to gain funding.
> As Roeland and I have pointed out,
> we can overcome the top-down problem and possibly even the efficacy
> problem but not the distaste for the meanness.
>
> I once told my son that if basic human courtesy had to be enforced in
> any given social situation get the heck out of that situation - unless
> you have a higher moral purpose for being there. Well, do we?
Yes. But it may be that some are not willing to take the gaff.
Politics is politics. Sometimes it gets ugly.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Eric
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|