Re[2]: [ga] Registrar domain deletion policies

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

The main problem of the ICANN is the way they consider the users: nothing. 
Because no part to their contracts. If you read ICP-3 you see that the main 
argument is that the user are too stupid to understand that an 
"alt(sic)tld" is not supported bu he ICANN. When you read the reports 
abuopt ".org" the NC would not believe you if you explained them that a 
non-profit night have he idea bu its oan move to ask for an ".org" domain 
name. etc...

Obvioiusly if the Local Internet Communities were smart enough to form a 
comon international organization, there would be no more need for the ICANN....

Jefsey



On 23:50 21/12/01, William X Walsh said:
>Friday, Friday, December 21, 2001, 2:32:40 PM, Rick H Wesson wrote:
>
>
> > William,
>
> > I don't have the authortative refrence on this, maybe dan does. But there
> > is a policy on deleteing domains, stated in the contracts registrars have
> > with ICANN.
>
>Thats the problem with these contracts though, the registrant is not a
>party to them, and can't bring action against a Registrar for
>violating them, only ICANN can, and we've seen how well they enforce
>their contracts.
>
>--
>Best regards,
>William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
>--
>Webcertificates.info
>SSL Certificates for resellers from $49ea
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html