<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: [ALSC-Forum] Re: [GTLD Registries List] What is the accreditatio...
Jess my man,
Can you please lighten up and see that you and Mr. Young see things
the same in most respects?
Please take a look and if you speak of consistence, you will find the
law applied half assed.
May I be so bold as to take a stab at consensus between you as though
I were acting as some
half assed chair?
a. human concern must prevail over commercial concern.
b. Icann, UDRP and WIPO should place individuals
above Industrial concerns.
c. We do not need a regulatory body to defend IP
interests, but rather one to defend
individual interests.
Peace and happy new year,
Eric
JessWest@aol.com wrote:
In a message
dated 12/31/2001 6:01:50 PM Central Standard Time, byoung651@attbi.com
writes:
I
don't disagree. However, the law as it currently exists recognizes
the right of trademark holders over domain names whether we agree or not.
I'm just arguing to limit that right to a few domains.
First of all, you cannot
apply the law half-assed to where you want it like limiting it to a few
domains and not all! Fortunately or unfortunately, laws come in one-size
only.
Second of all, it is not
the trademark law, but how the legal system is being abused
by WIPO and ICANN for the benefit of a few. The Courts do recognize
the rights of common law and first usage under the trademark laws.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|