Re: Fwd: Re[2]: [ga] Re: VeriSign Proposal a Done Deal??

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

At 6:08 PM -0500 1/5/02, JessWest@aol.com wrote:
>
>In a message dated 1/5/2002 2:04:53 PM Central Standard Time,
>cgomes@verisign.com writes:
>
>>Since 1996, there have been potential domain name holders who have
>>requested some sort of wait list service in case domain names are
>>released into the available pool.  The service at the registrar level
>>was a response to this demand.  Putting the service at the registry
>>level improves the value of the service for potential registrants.
>>
>
>
>Improves it for who?   You, SAIC, NSI, Verisign and other employees and
>executives  and politicians that have already pocketed millions?

Except for the fact that you missed out SnapNames, the list appears to be
right on the button.

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html