<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] For those interested in delete games
William,
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, William X Walsh wrote:
>
> There is no need for additional proposals, Verisign should resolve the
> technical problems they may be having, and the current system should
> stand unless and until there is a REAL need for changing it.
ok, thanks for the comment.
> Verisign should be required to substantiate the NEED For a change in
> the current system, and pointing out PRECISELY what problems exist in
> the current system that warrant a change in the way this process
> works, and then a process should be developed and approved of that
> resolve the problems.
they have; at least to registrars.
> Verisign is instead trying to use the existence of a fictional problem
> to justify creating a new program that will make up for the tremendous
> loss of market share that their Registrar has experienced in the last
> 2 years and create a completely new profit center for them.
the problem is not fictional. bareing this in mind would you now like to
submit some requirements?
thanks,
-rick
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|