<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] RFC;-)
Dear Mr. Gomes,
I hope with all the hoopla that the new year finds you well and all of
your family prospering.
I request your comments on behalf of your company to the following.
May we in the GA count on your company's' appraisal of a GA
working group regarding the Deletion Matter prior to your taking
further action?
(this would assume that we form a group post haste, form it
in a sublist, assure its' openness and transparency, reach a
valid consensus, allow for dissenting opinion, and deliver a
tentative draft by the end of January)
Of course it is informal, but through openness and transparency,
you could afford it the weight it deserves. I would ask that Masseurs.
Wesson and Walsh initially chair the group and that Mr. Lovell and
Mr. Roessler act as Co-Secretariat. I would further ask that Mr.
Steinberg, Mr. Svennson and Ms. McKee informally monitor and
watchdog it. By breaking it up so the workload should not be
too burdensome on any.
Cross posting to the GA main would be allowed and we would
ask the Secretariat to provide updates in summary form to
to the main body, which could be forwarded to other lists.
Mr. Gomes would your company recognize such an endeavor and
consider it?
Sincerely,
Eric
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|