<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: Re[2]: [ga] Re: VeriSign Proposal a Done Deal??
George,
Let me change the analogy. Is it okay for a property manager to have a
waiting list?
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Kirikos [mailto:gkirikos@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 5:19 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Joop Teernstra'; 'abel@able-towers.com'
> Cc: ga@dnso.org; discuss-list@opensrs.org
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [ga] Re: VeriSign Proposal a Done Deal??
>
>
> Hello,
>
> --- "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> wrote:
> > On a different note, let me try an analogy. Is it okay for a
> > landlord
> > to have a waiting list for a house in case the current
> rentors do not
> > renew their lease?
>
> Are you suggesting that Verisign is the LANDLORD for dot-com?
> Yes or no
> would be nice.
>
> Landlords have ownership, and simply rent out names. As far as I am
> aware (please correct me if I am mistaken), Verisign registry
> is simply
> the property manager on behalf of the true owners (be it ICANN, the US
> Government, internet society at large, who really knows, etc.),
> managing the registration database. Having been the property managers
> for so long, Verisign might feel that they can do what they
> want....but
> some day the absentee landlords might wake up and decide to
> replace the
> property managers, or at a minimum remind them that they have a
> property manager's contract and code of behaviour.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> George Kirikos
> http://www.kirikos.com/
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
> http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
>
smime.p7s
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|