[ga] RE: This is not working for positive results.

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

I think I have a history of responding to questions on this list and
elsewhere.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dierker [mailto:eric@hi-tek.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:39 PM
> To: abel@able-towers.com
> Cc: George Kirikos; Gomes, Chuck; 'Joop Teernstra'; ga@dnso.org;
> discuss-list@opensrs.org
> Subject: This is not working for positive results.
> 
> 
> Dear Mr. Gomes,
> 
> I have gotten some feed back on a working group.
> 
> One of the best is from Mr. Walsh;
> 
> If we form a consensus on a dozen questions to ask would you 
> be willing
> to use your good efforts to answer them for us?
> 
> Based upon those answers we would put forth our position by 
> the end of January.
> 
> Due to the short fuse this would be informal but based upon 
> your willingness here
> 
> I think we could all move forth in good faith.
> 
> We here in the GA would at least form a reasonable position 
> and you would have
> the value of consumer desires that may help to a large degree 
> in your public
> relations.
> 
> Mr. Raders' and this post illustrate the combined desire to 
> move forward
> productively.
> 
> I am testing ga-icann for this purpose but am not yet confirmed.
> 
> I again ask Mr. Wesson and Mr. Walsh to chair such a group or 
> at least facilitate
> a
> volunteer chair.
> 
> The Ga membership has an historic opportunity to give the 
> impact it warrants and
> the
> largest industry Giant VRSN seems willing to work directly 
> with us to shape
> policy.
> 
> Please join with me in creating a scenario that contributes 
> greatly to the
> development
> of a proper working order of our mission.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Eric
> 
> Abel Wisman wrote:
> 
> > assembly,
> >
> > sorry to intrude again, but.....
> >
> > in the analogy, even if the property manager IS allowed, 
> this subscription is
> > never more then one month lease, iow 1/12 of $ 6  and not 
> equal to 7 years
> >
> > however, while you are going to answer a few question mr 
> Gomes, perhaps the
> > following ones can be taken to answer to:
> >
> > 1. I do read the proposal right, where it says the $ 40 is 
> for ONE year
> > waitlist, and has to be renewed after that year ?
> >
> > 2. where does the registry obtain the right to sell these 
> domains, after they
> > are deleted, or perhaps we have a different dictionary ? 
> mine states that
> > deletion means:
> >
> > Pronunciation:  di-'lEt, dE-
> > Function:       transitive verb
> > Inflected Form(s):      de·let·ed; de·let·ing
> > Etymology:      Latin deletus, past participle of delEre to 
> wipe out, destroy
> > Date:   circa 1605
> > : to eliminate especially by blotting out, cutting out, or erasing
> >
> > now as far as i know, the registry is supposed to delete 
> any name that is not
> > paid for (renewal) or otherwise offered for deletion.
> > from that I conclude that the sale of the domain is 
> illegal, since while it
> > is owned prior to deletion, by a registrant, the registry 
> has no power over
> > the domain and once it is deleted it no longer exists, 
> henceforth this
> > question.
> >
> > Should the plan be based on transfer (XFER) then the direct 
> permission of the
> > owner is needed nad needs to be paid for (assumption)
> >
> > Since these are basic questions on all proposals, i would 
> like to see these
> > answered, since being a part of any illegal transaction is 
> something my
> > council has advised against, on grounds they understand 
> better then I do, but
> > it had to do with penal institutions, which does not sound 
> as being a
> > comfortable hotel.
> >
> > Of course even if the above were answered in a way that 
> some rights could be
> > obtained from somewhere, then i still believe that (and i 
> would like this
> > hypothesis answered to) the additional value  placed upon 
> the domain could
> > influence the current registrant to re-evaluate his/her 
> position in the
> > decision of not renewing, keeping that knowledge from the 
> registrant shoudl
> > then make way for a nice lawsuit
> >
> > thank you for the time to answer
> >
> > regards
> >
> > abel
> >
> > On Wednesday 09 January 2002 2:59 am, George Kirikos wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > --- "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> wrote:
> > > > George,
> > > >
> > > > Let me change the analogy.  Is it okay for a property 
> manager to have
> > > > a
> > > > waiting list?
> > >
> > > I've noticed that Chuck never actually ANSWERS a question 
> (I'm still
> > > waiting patiently for the answers to prior questions), but simply
> > > answers a question with his own question. I shall set the example,
> > > though, by answering his question.
> > >
> > > Is it ok for a property manager to have a waiting list?
> > >
> > > The answer is: MAYBE.
> >
> > --
> > Abel Wisman
> > office  +44-20 84 24 24 2 2
> > mobile +44-78 12 14 19 16
> >
> > www.able-towers.com for all your hosting and co-location at 
> affordable prices
> > www.url.org domainregistrations, there is no better
> > www.grid9.net bandwidth sales, for high-grade solutions
> > www.telesave.net for the best rates on long distance calls
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

smime.p7s