Re: [ga] WG Delete Progress

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Eric and all assembly members,

Eric Dierker wrote:

> We are making great progress here and I personally thank you for all
> your input.
>
> Please correct this statement if it is wrong.
>
> The GA has never on its own established a working group.

  Yes you are wrong.  The WG A, B, C, D, and E were created
by request of the predominance of the DNSO GA members.
Although these WG were improperly restricted as to GA member
participation...

>
>
> Establishment of working groups has never been a bottom up approach.
>
> WGs have always been established from the top down.
>
> With these truths it is consistent that we beg for the top to allow us a
> WG.
>
> However and with that said;
>
> I believe it is wrong.
>
> It would appear that working groups should be established at this level
> and the
> results passed up.
>
> Jeff would you please reconcile this with your position regarding notice
> and
> appropriate approval.  Although I address it below.  I think we are
> seeing it
> the same way but expressing it differently.  At any rate we will be
> moving forward
> with your notice demand.
>
> At this point I think we can move forward by;
>
> Giving notice and request input from all the substantial players a
> partial list would be:
> SEC, NC, BoD, the Pope, DoC all SOs, IETF, All DNSO groups and obviously
> VRSN.
>
> Using for the time being ga-sys and remaining open to improvement.
>
> Acknowledging this is not an issue regarding sublists, simply a
> convenience for expedience.
>
> I think I can move with Jeffs point if I apply it thusly, "notification
> is not about asking, it
> is about respect and openness and transparency and if we begin by
> showing such respect
> then we have a far better chance of receiving it"
> (the immediate above is what we all know we need for funding)
>
> Oh and about the Pope, go ahead and laugh, within a few months he
> will announce a Saint of the Internet, How many billion Latin American
> users do you
> think that will effect.  No, I am not, I am an Episcopal lay minister.
>
> This has taken some real effort by real people who want to do what is
> right but
> disagree on method.  Thank you all again.
>
> Please sign up for the ga-sys list so we can take off on Monday.  If we
> lose any participants because
> it is going to a sublist, I humbly apologize but I can find no
> reasonable compromise that will
> please everyone.
>
> Sincerely,
> Eric
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html