Re: [Fwd: [ga] NOTICE/GA-WG-Delete/RFC - Attn. DNSO Secretariat and NC]

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Your strong position is duly noted and I am trying to bring it into the
consensual
parameters of others concerns.

1.    I remove myself with all haste.(yesterday is way to late)
2.    We do not move anything but simply create another more focused
constructive forum.
3.    the discussions remain on this list and we simply put together a
more focused
clearing house in order to establish a modicum of consensus and united
front.
4.    polls are specific and readily available for call.
5.    CCing to this list and others is encouraged to propagate open and
transparent results.
6.    We prioritize in not beginning with positions but with pointed
questions.

Thank you again for your tireless effort in this regard Mr. Roessler.  I
hope that this further clarification of
our evolving consensual position is helpful in your analysis and ability
to contribute.

Certainly it is agreed that my controversial personality should not be an
impediment to moving forward.

Best to all of you,

Eric

Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 2002-01-13 11:53:21 -0800, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> >New chairs will be elected and appointed in the next few days.  My
> >administrative role in this group will end at that point.
>
> You have no administrative role in this group at this point of time,
> and I'd strongly suggest that you do not simulate having one to
> others.
>
> Since there's no visible benefit in moving these discussions away
>  from the main GA list at this time (at least, nobody has pointed one
> out so far, I think), I'd (again) suggest that the discussion on the
> deletion issue remains on the main GA list.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler                        http://log.does-not-exist.org/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html