ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Thank you.


Thomas,

This is an excellent start.  Looks like your transition team was hard at
work on the weekend.

Thomas Roessler wrote:

> I'm writing this message on behalf of Alexander and myself.  First
> of all, we'd like to thank you for the trust you have expressed by
> giving us your votes.
>
> We'll try to make this mailing list a better place for fruitful
> discussions on DNSO issues - under the assumption that the NC
> chooses to follow the GA's wishes, of course. ;-)
>
> Some things we'll do, or try to do:
>
>  - Alexander will take over list monitoring.  For the time being,
>    he'll be the only list monitor.
>
>  - The GA's rules of conduct and the posting limit (5 posts per day
>    and individual) will be enforced. In particular, those who are
>    currently exceeding their posting limit on a regular basis should
>    make use of the time until the names council teleconference on
>    Friday to get used to a lower posting frequency again.
>
>  - The GA summary will be posted on a half-regular basis (I'll try
>    weekly, but I can't promise).  The summary is intended to help
>    those who don't read every posting to this list to understand
>    what's going on, and not to miss the more important and
>    substantial points.  In particular, we'd appreciate if
>    representatives from DNSO constituencies could regularly forward
>    the summary to their constituencies' mailing lists.
>
>    (Of course, you can also just drop me a line and tell me where I
>    should send it.)
>
>  - We'll try to persuade the DNSO constituencies to more frequently
>    move discussions on interesting and important topics to the GA
>    list, like the registrars did with WLS.  Of course, constituency
>    members are welcome to follow the topics. ;-)
>
>  - We'll try to persuade the GA's representatives to the various task
>    forces to send reports to the GA list on a half-regular basis.
>    Look at David Farrar's report from the review task force, or at
>    Marc Schneider's latest summary on dot-org for examples.
>
>    (We'll write more on the Task Force vs. WG issue in a separate
>    posting.)
>
> You may notice that much of this involves persuading others to do
> something.  That's right.  We can't, we don't want, and we won't
> be the entertainers who fill this mailing list with discussions.
>
> However, we will try to make sure that YOU find an agreeable
> framework for intelligent discussions on this mailing list.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Thomas Roessler                        http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


  • References:

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>