<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[2]: [ga] WLS - Better Margins for Registrars
Thursday, Thursday, January 17, 2002, 8:59:22 PM, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Eric Schneider wrote:
>> WLS PROPOSAL
>> It's common for anything new to get bashed by an existing system that
>> perceives the new as threatening or disruptive. This seems to be the case
>> for the WLS proposal. It is my opinion that the community is over reacting
>> to this proposal. Though, I as 'Joe Consumer', have less at stake than most
>> of the other comments and postings that are representative of competing
>> registrars, I do have respect for those who have voiced opposition to the
>> proposal by default, but yet remain open minded that there may be further
>> serious consideration if the WLS proposal is tweaked or fine tuned.
> Eric, one question: if you are a consumer then why is the domain name
> associated with your email address that of a registrar?
More accurately, a reseller of a registrar :)
I'm sure you will understand why I make a point of noting the
distinction. Unlike Registrars, resellers of registrar services have
no voice inside ICANN. The registrars constituency won't have us, the
business constituency wants rules to bar us from there, and there just
isn't any other place for us to be heard.
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
"There is no better way to exercise the imagination than the study of
the law. No artist ever interpreted nature as freely as a lawyer
interprets the truth."
-- Jean Giradoux
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|