<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Fw: [RegistrarsList] Updated WLS Documents
Thanks Ross.
Let me make clear that there is no problem at all with posting the
documents anywhere you like. They are public documents and we intended
them to be so from the beginning.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:53 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; Registrars@Dnso. Org; ga@dnso.org;
> Discuss-List@Opensrs. Org
> Subject: Re: [ga] Fw: [RegistrarsList] Updated WLS Documents
>
>
> Chuck,
>
> > What you thought you realized, that the documents were "only made
> > available via the password protected VGRS Registrar Support
> site," was
> > in fact WRONG.
>
> I was referring to the fact that I was under the impression
> that there had
> been an attachment to the message that I forwarded - hence
> the "only". The
> GA list has a habit of being slow on the distribution of
> attachments, which
> is probably why there is a 90 minute delay from the time that
> you sent the
> original message to the time that I, and many others received
> it. Its not my
> habit to pollute lists with information and attachments that
> have already
> been aired - it is in my nature to pass on information that I deem
> interesting and relevant to parties that I feel would be
> interested in it.
>
> > in fact WRONG. Moreover, it was extremely inappropriate to
> cross-post a
> > message sent to VeriSign's registrars list to another list.
> Nor do I
>
> As far as whether it was appropriate for me to forward the message to
> additional lists, I actually took the time to make determine
> whether the
> usual VGRS-Registrars list disclaimer was in effect
> (Participants on the
> VeriSign Global Registry Services registrars list are requested to not
> cross-post messages.) It wasn't. Thus, a number of lists with
> interested
> parties subscribed to them (like our internal management
> mailing list) were
> cc'ed on a forward of this message. To be completely honest,
> each of these
> groups would have gotten a message from me even if the
> disclaimer was in
> effect, but I probably would have quickly rewritten the text
> to ensure that
> VGRS' wishes were respected.
>
> It appears that conclusion jumping and conspiracy theorizing
> is contagious.
> Getting to the human intent of a digital communication is
> iffy at best, lets
> not make it any worse.
>
> Apologies for any confusion that I may have caused, but
> please, (and I'm
> talking to everyone that reads this) lets not build a
> mountain out of this
> molehill.
>
> -rwr
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>
> To: "'Ross Wm. Rader'" <ross@tucows.com>; "Registrars@Dnso. Org"
> <registrars@dnso.org>; <ga@dnso.org>; "Discuss-List@Opensrs. Org"
> <discuss-list@opensrs.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:18 PM
> Subject: RE: [ga] Fw: [RegistrarsList] Updated WLS Documents
>
>
> > Ross,
> >
> > What you thought you realized, that the documents were "only made
> > available via the password protected VGRS Registrar Support
> site," was
> > in fact WRONG. Moreover, it was extremely inappropriate to
> cross-post a
> > message sent to VeriSign's registrars list to another list.
> Nor do I
> > simply want to fault Ross because, as other posts have illustrated,
> > others jumped to the same false conclusions.
> >
> > For all of the conspiracy theorists on this list as well as
> those who
> > cannot see past their anti-VeriSign emotions please note
> the following:
> > 1) the two documents were sent by me to the GA list at
> 11:49 am EST; 2)
> > the two documents were sent to the VGRS registrars list at
> 12:08 pm; 3)
> > some simple arithmetic indicates that the documents were
> sent to the GA
> > list prior to being sent to the private VGRS registrars list.
> >
> > I tolerate a lot of garbage on this list, but the posts on
> this subject
> > during the last couple hours have gone beyond my
> willingness to ignore.
> > They provide prime evidence why the GA is often ignored.
> And that is
> > very unfortunate for the many members of the list who work
> hard to make
> > it a constructive source of input regarding DNSO issues.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:38 PM
> > > To: Ross Wm. Rader; Registrars@Dnso. Org; ga@dnso.org;
> > > Discuss-List@Opensrs. Org
> > > Subject: Re: [ga] Fw: [RegistrarsList] Updated WLS Documents
> > >
> > >
> > > I hadn't realized that this was only made available via
> the password
> > > protected VGRS Registrar Support site. I have made them
> available at
> > > http://www.byte.org/rc-deletes without a password if you wish
> > > to view them
> > > in MS-Word format.
> > >
> > > -rwr
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
> > > To: "Registrars@Dnso. Org" <registrars@dnso.org>; <ga@dnso.org>;
> > > "Discuss-List@Opensrs. Org" <discuss-list@opensrs.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:01 PM
> > > Subject: [ga] Fw: [RegistrarsList] Updated WLS Documents
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "VeriSign Global Registry Services"
> <info@verisign-grs.com>
> > > > To: <registrars@verisign-grs.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:36 AM
> > > > Subject: [RegistrarsList] Updated WLS Documents
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To All Registrars:
> > > >
> > > > Two documents related to the wait listing service (WLS)
> > > have been posted
> > > to
> > > > our web site:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Revised WLS proposal based on feedback received from
> > > registrars and
> > > other
> > > > interested and parties
> > > > 2. Justification for a Registry-based Wait Listing
> Service document
> > > >
> > > > These documents are located at:
> > > > http://www.verisign-grs.com/support/waitListService.pdf
> (Revised WLS
> > > > document)
> > > > http://www.verisign-grs.com/support/WLS_Justification.pdf
> > > (Justification
> > > > document)
> > > >
> > > > Please note the recommended procedures and deadlines for
> > > questions and
> > > > feedback that are contained toward the beginning of the
> > > revised proposal.
> > > > Feedback for these documents should be directed to
> wls@verisign.com.
> > > >
> > > > VeriSign GRS will be distributing these documents to other
> > > constituencies
> > > as
> > > > well and encouraging responses from all interested parties.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Chris Sheridan
> > > > Manager, Customer Service
> > > > VeriSign Global Registry Services
> > > > www.verisign-grs.com
> > > > info@verisign-grs.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> >
>
smime.p7s
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|