Re[2]: [ga] gtld Statement on NC Election (Please Post)

[Don Brown <donbrown_l@inetconcepts.net>]

I also agree.  This is akin to bid rigging, jury tampering, etc.  It
is not the proper way to handle things, IMHO.


Tuesday, January 29, 2002, 12:07:59 PM, DPF <david@farrar.com> wrote:
D> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:13:33 -0600, "Neuman, Jeff"
D> <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us> wrote:

>>We urge the NC to reject the motion and hold an immediate election for its
>>chair in accordance with the Rules of Procedure that are currently in
>>effect.  If it turns out that this motion is desirable by the Internet
>>community, the motion can be voted on at some point in the future (after
>>enough time for feedback from the ICANN community) and apply to subsequent
>>elections.

D> I agree.  Terms of office and term limits should not be changed in
D> such a way which affect an incumbent.

D> DPF
D> --
D> david@farrar.com
D> ICQ 29964527
D> --
D> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
D> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
D> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
D> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




----
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA     Internet Concepts, Inc.
donbrown_l@inetconcepts.net         http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55              (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
----

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html