Re: [ga] charging for renewals after expiry

[Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>]

Abel,

most registrars (including alice's registry) contain a provision in their
registration agreements that reserve the right to charge a customer to
"revive" a registration that has expired.

there may be alot of work involved ro revive registrations hense the
proision for the charge.

-rick


On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Abel Wisman wrote:

> Assembly,
>
> It has come to my attention that Enom has found an alternative way of making
> money on "late" renewals.
> Now I am not opposed to anyone making a decent profit but it seems to me that
> by doing the following:
>
> Charging a customer a $ 20 surcharge for renewals after expiry date.
>
> Enom creates a think layer between the intrest of the registrar to renew
> ontime and to renew to late.
>
> Given the pro-rata same amount of work (or less if we "forget" a reminder or
> two) charging an amount this size can paint a picture from a client point of
> view that will add to the "weird" impression more and more clients get from
> the registrar community.
>
> I wonder what the opinion of the GA is in this matter
>
> abel
>
> --
> Abel Wisman
> office	+44-20 84 24 24 2 2
> mobile +44-78 12 14 19 16
>
> www.able-towers.com for all your hosting and co-location at affordable prices
> www.url.org domainregistrations, there is no better
> www.grid9.net bandwidth sales, for high-grade solutions
> www.telesave.net for the best rates on long distance calls
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html