Re: [ga] Future of sub-lists

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

On 18:25 09/01/02, Patrick Corliss said:
>William X. Walsh killed off the idea with a barrage of criticism.  This was
>part of the reason I resigned as Alt Chair.   The lists were very carefully
>set up to cover the main policy issues.  Danny added [ga-review] in the vain
>hope that he could kick start that initiative.

Untrue. You killed the idea as you kill it today.

The reason while it failed is that they were very carefully set-up. What is 
of interest is to have lists set-up and killed as the people wants them. 
The entire mistake Danny and you made in supporting the WG-Review "jefsey's 
proposition" was to kick our ass into your sub-lists. No one likes it.

The "jefsey's proposition" (cf. WG-Review archives and Joana Lane's site) 
was that if people wants to discuss a topic one of them or a group of them 
initiate a working site and list. The site to document position statements 
and the list to discuss them until we can aggregate them into a consensus. 
So anyone might pop-in/out a debate without loosing the thread and 
competences may  be self acknowledged.

A very different approach from your rigid, non site supported, rules 
enforced, debate reported, ga list separated artificial sub-lists.

I do not say the "jefsey's proposition" would work. But I say you never 
tried it.
Jefsey

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html