<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] FYI: Structure TF report draft v6
For easier discussion -- a text-only excerpt from
the Structure TF report draft v6
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-str/Arc00/doc00013.doc
>[...]
>
>Recommendations of the Structure TF based on evaluation
>
>1. First principles
>An ALSO should not have the same characteristics, rights and
>representation of the other supporting organisations. Indeed,
>trying to fit an ALSO into an SO straitjacket will be
>damaging to the ALSO and to ICANN consensus making.
>
>2. Board directors. Against an objective to create a means of
>electing ICANN at-large board directors the TF endorses the
>ALSC proposals to create an ALSO.
>
>3. Consensus building. Against an objective to outreach
>downwards and develop policy consensus among individual
>domain name holders, the TF endorses the structural proposals
>of the ALSC.
>
>4. Policy support to the Board. Against an objective to
>provide policy input upwards to the Board (subsequent to
>consensus building), the TF recommends that the following
>structure be adopted for ALSO input on policy recommendations
>to the Board. The three members of the proposed At-large
>administrative council are given membership of the DNSO Names
>Council, and participate within that body exercising voting
>and other policy-related privileges in the same way as the
>three representatives of the DNSO constituencies.
>
>The three ALSO reps would have no vote in the election of
>DNSO Board members and no policy recommendations would come
>from the ALSO separately. Such membership would be contingent
>on the absence of an individual domain name holders
>constituency within the DNSO or its equivalent.
>
>This solves at a stroke three issues:
>* the likelihood of contradictory or confusing advice
>reaching the Board from the DNSO and the ALSO
>* creating a clear mechanism for ALSO/DNSO policy
>interaction.
>* avoiding duplication by DNSO constituencies in policy work
>in both the DNSO and ALSO.
>
>Mechanistic details:
>1. ALSO is formed and directly elects 6 Board members.
>2. ALSO also elects 12 member Administrative Council (as ALSC
>proposal but with an administrative role to organise the SO
>and outreach downwards on policy)
>3. ALSO Administrative Council selects 3 members (or the 3
>top geographically diverse of the directly-elected council
>election list) appointed to Names Council to input on policy
>matters.
>4. The individuals petitioning for an individual domain name
>holders constituency within the DNSO are encouraged to
>participate in the ALSO and become AL Administrative Council
>members and reps to the NC.
>5. The GA reverts to its intended role of uniting all DNSO
>constituencies (and expands to include the AL Administrative
>Council and NC reps).
>
>5. Threshold criteria for ALSO membership before elections
>could start.
>It is critical that unambiguous criteria be set up to gauge
>whether the ALSO is in fact ready to operate as an ICANN
>supporting organisation. The ALSO will need sufficient
>resources and interest levels to ensure that participation in
>the SO will result in meaningful and significant
>representation for individual domain name holders.
>
>The first test should be an appropriate adaptation of the
>DNSO criteria for establishing new DNSO constituencies. In
>addition the following points are key.
>
>- Membership
>At some point a threshold will need to be established as
>defining "significant representation." It is beyond the scope
>of this report to define that threshold but it may be useful
>to consider a rationale for definition and establish
>parameters.
>
>- An upper parameter
>The ALSC report there were 143,789 on the first At-Large e-
>mail list, that 76,183 were validated to vote and that 34,035
>voted. Any new process should do at least as well, so a
>threshold of 30,000 seems reasonable for an upper parameter
>for ALSO membership before elections can begin.
>
>- A lower parameter
>In North America 3,449 voted in the first elections. There
>are over 150,000,000 Internet users in North America, so this
>is 0.0023%. World wide there are around 500,000,000 Internet
>users so 0.0023% is 11,500. Charging for membership will
>reduce this to say 10%. So set 1000 as the lower parameter.
>
>The report recommends that a threshold is set at a figure
>between 1000 and 30,000.
>
>- Other criteria
>In addition to membership, criteria on the ability to
>effectively keep members informed, and adequate financing for
>meetings and dues payments are crucial to ensuring that the
>ALSO can support its mission and will not be subject to
>capture by a small group.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|