Re: [ga] Icannatlarge.com - conflict of interest

["James Love" <love@cptech.org>]

What is the policy with regard to people voting several times in the various
DNSO constituencies?  We have a lot of people in the NCC that could got get
a vote elsewhere, the probably "belong" in the individual one, and a lot of
people in the registry/registrar business, that don't "belong" in the NCC.

Jamie


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>
To: "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>
Cc: <ga@dnso.org>; "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Icannatlarge.com - conflict of interest


> joann & others...
>
> i would hope that as an individual i would be able to participate in the
> icann-at-large without any concern of being "intimidated" into not
> participating .
>
> correspondence of this sort is not constructive. if you have concerns
> joanna, i personally feel  you should take them DIRECTLY to Marilyn
instead
> of trying to make a public 'thing" out of it.
>
> this is not a good way to start out here.. many of us work for companies
> which may already be participating in some way in one or another
> constituancy or already be part of a specific "interest group" (i believe
> that Karl Auerbach has some financial relationship with Cisco and no one
> questions his right to participate)
>
> suggest you "back it down a notch or two"  here
>
> regards
>
> ken stubbs
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joanna Lane" <jo-uk@rcn.com>
> To: <mcade@att.com>
> Cc: <ga@dnso.org>; "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>;
> <DannyYounger@cs.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 12:37 AM
> Subject: [ga] Icannatlarge.com - conflict of interest
>
>
> > (I am posting this to the GA because the ALSC forum list has been
killed.)
> >
> > Dear Marilyn,
> >
> > I notice you have just signed up as an individual member and domain name
> > holder of the new At Large Members Organization at
> > http://www.icannatlarge.com. In what capacity may I ask?
> >
> > As you know, the At Large Organization is being set up primarily to
lobby
> > ICANN for representation of those who are currently not able to
> participate
> > in the process through membership of other groups, specifically
individual
> > domain name registrants, users and the public in general.
> >
> > Now, please correct me if I'm wrong, but you are a professional Internet
> and
> > Government lobbyist in fulltime employ with AT&T, a Telco. In that
> capacity
> > you are a member of the DNSO Business Constituency and represent that
> group
> > (some 33 Businesses) on the Names Council. You Chair two of the NC's
Task
> > Forces, namely the Transfer Task Force and the Whois Task Force, and
will
> be
> > speaking on behalf of both of those groups (representing the views of
all
> 7
> > constituencies) at the forthcoming Names Council Meeting in Accra
> > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc09/msg00210.html. Furthermore,
> you
> > have some unspecified involvement with the IDN Task Force
> > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-idn/Arc00/msg00036.html which still
> leaves
> > time for you to be an active member of the DNSO General Assembly. This
> > amounts to your representing every single member of each constituency of
> the
> > DNSO at one time or another in the current process.
> >
> > Now, are we to understand that in addition to this, you now seek for
your
> > voice to be heard in the formation of this new bottom-up organization?
If
> > so, would this be on a level playing field with every other individual,
> > including the possibility of standing for election as an officer of the
At
> > Large? Or are we to understand that you have joined simply to make a (no
> > doubt generous) pledge on behalf of AT & T, with no desire to expand
your
> > role into areas such as seeking election as a representative of At Large
> > Members within the ICANN process?
> >
> > Thank you for the clarification.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Joanna
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html