Re: [ga] Structure Taskforce - feedback needed on report

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 06:18 7/03/02 +1300, DPF wrote:

>In terms of specific positions it has been my reading of the GA that
>the consensus expressed here has been for:
>- nine instead of six board members
>- no linking of at large eligibility to domain name holdership
>- a low (if any) membership fee
>- a low (if any) threshold/quorum for the at large to be recognised
>(approx 1,000 max?)

I don't think the GA has expressed anything about numbers, but in view of 
the current rate of signup on www.icannatlarge.com (300 in  7 days ) I 
think 1000 is reasonable.

Therefore : No objections to the above assessment from me.

--Joop

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html