Re: [ga] Organizing structure work.

[Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>]

On 2002-03-12 15:29:48 -0500, Joanna Lane wrote:

>Not that I disagree with your approach, and it's great to see a 
>positive reaction to pull everybdoy together, but is the purpose 
>of the WG to produce one definitive DNSO restructuring proposal on 
>the basis of a consensus of participants in the proposed WG? Or do 
>you think a number of mutually exclusive proposals may be put 
>forward, each of which could go forward separately?

What will have to be done first is this:

 - understand what kinds of proposals are out there
 - understand what these proposals mean
 - document that understanding

At least for the first steps, it's not really important whether we 
strive for the Great Unified Reform Plan (I don't believe we'll be 
the ones to find that one, but we may wish to keep the goal within 
sight), or whether we just try to end up with a set of distinct and 
well-understood proposals.  In fact, the latter is a necessary step 
on the way to a GURP, and it's a step to which the GA can reasonably 
try to contribute by bundling public input into the DNSO's "GURP 
process". ;-)

-- 
Thomas Roessler                        http://log.does-not-exist.org/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html