RE: [ga] FW: Comments Received Regarding Revised WLS Proposal

[Abel Wisman <abel@able-towers.com>]

Chuck, you are not seriously implying that the GA consensus answer was a
single-handed action by me, are you ?
the lack of negative comment and the outright support for it may almost
be called unique in GA history, so please..spare me

abel



On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 08:28, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Harold,
>  
> All the comments that were sent to the wls@verisign.com
> <mailto:wls@verisign.com>  address after VGRS' responses to the questions
> were posted.
>  
> I can only assume you did not read the entire document.  There was no
> filtering of comments. Please note that the GA comments (Abel's comments)
> were included; in my opinion they were very negative; they were included in
> spite of the fact that no evidence of representativeness was provided.
>  
> Chuck
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harold Whiting [mailto:Harold@PeterWhiting.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:46 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; 'ga@dnso.org'
> Subject: Re: [ga] FW: Comments Received Regarding Revised WLS Proposal
> 
> 
> The Registrar's Constituency's Formal response to the WLS is missing.
> How convenient, for it does NOT support the WLS.
> 
> Also very convenient is the absence of the the expanded discussion over
> whether the registry was contractually allowed to roll out and charge for
> this type of service.
> I do not see this type of service listed in the Registry contract's appendix
> of "allowed" services that the registry could charge for.  Neither did
> anyone else.
> 
> Chuck, if you are going to publish only the feedback that is favorable to
> WLS, make it clear that that is what you are doing.  As usual, this is a
> blatantly biased posting by VeriSign.
> 
> --HJW--
> 
> At 02:09 AM 3/15/2002 -0500, Gomes, Chuck wrote: 
> 
> 
> FYI
>  
> Chuck
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Johnson, Terry 
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:29 PM
> To: 'jim.foley@neteka.com'; 'mdierstein@namebay.com';
> 'abel@able-towers.com'; 'info@firstplace.com'
> Cc: 'Stahura@enom.com'; Gomes, Chuck; 'donny@intercosmos.com';
> 'jarcher@registrationtek.com'; 'gbertrand@neteka.com'
> Subject: Comments Received Regarding Revised WLS Proposal
> 
>  To all respondents: 
> 
> On behalf of Chuck Gomes, thanks once again for taking time to share your
> comments and feedback concerning the proposed Wait Listing Service (WLS).
> As stated, it has been our goal to aggregate the feedback that is collected
> and post this for public record to the VeriSign website.  To that end, we
> have posted to our website the collective feedback that was submitted to
> VGRS, and received at wls@verisign.com <mailto:wls@verisign.com>  as of
> 4:30P, March 14, 2002.  The URL where these comments regarding the revised
> Wait Listing Proposal may be viewed is at:
> http://www.verisign-grs.com/wls.html <http://www.verisign-grs.com/wls.html>
> . (under the title: "Comments on Wait List Service Proposal")
> 
>  
> 
> Terry Johnson
>  
> VeriSign Global Registry Services
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> Harold Whiting 
> 
-- 
Abel S.H. Wisman

Scottish Provident House 
76-80 College Road
Harrow Middlesex
HA1 1BQ 
UK
+44 20 8424 2422
+44 78 1214 1916

www.able-towers.com
www.url.org
www.grid9.net
www.telesave.net

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html