<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] GA rules?
On 2002-03-29 21:44:29 -0500, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>Does the GA still have rules that stipulate that messages must be
>relevant to the business of the GA, and that the messages must
>observe a minimum of decorum, including not indulging in personal
>attacks or insults?
Yes.
>The message posted at
>http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc10/msg00102.html does not
>appear to be relevant to the GA's business, and decorum seems to
>be seeking its lowest level.
No complaint has been submitted to the list monitors at
ga-abuse@dnso.org, as far as I can see this. If you want to
complain about a specific message, please do so.
There's no point in publicly complaining about inactivity of the
list monitor when you didn't even _try_ to draw his attention the
message in question first.
--
Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|