Re: [ga] Independent Review Panel?

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 00:49 11/04/02 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>It is well-known by now that, in the Lynn proposal, an independent
>review panel is characterized as a "waste."
>
>What do you folks think about this?

The original proposals for an Independent Review Panel are good and they 
are a necessary component of  ICANN's structure as originally envisaged.
That they have not been implemented is a crying shame.

With due respect, Thomas, I think it is misguided to now start casting 
about  for watered-down alternatives.

The only idea that I like is that of an industry Ombudsman, but this office 
could be separate from ICANN altogether and should not be used for review 
of Board decisions.

--Joop

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html