RE: [ga] Auerbach vs. ICANN update

[Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Which begs the question, which document is so incriminating that they would
want to go to this extreme? Maybe a document by document request would
narrow down the field.

Regards,
Joanna

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org]On Behalf Of James
> Love
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 6:48 PM
> To: sandy@storm.ca
> Cc: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [ga] Auerbach vs. ICANN update
>
>
> Maybe we should ask how much the lawusuit will end up costing ICANN...
> seems like the ICANN management doesn't like Karl very much, and is going
> to spend a lot of money on this seemingly pointless lawsuit.   I can't
> imagine anything that ICANN couldn't show its board
> members....The salaries
> aren't secret are they?    Jamie
>
>
> > Ken Stubbs wrote:
> >>
> >> hello sandy ..
> >>
> >> many your inquiries can be answered by reading the
> >> legal briefs prepared by both sides.
> >
> > I see nothing in either brief that answers my question.
> >
> >> > Can someone please tell me exactly what ICANN
> >> > management are protecting here? What parts of
> >> > ICANN financial records are confidential and
> >> > why?
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
> --
> James Love
> http://www.cptech.org mailto:james.love@cptech.org
> mobile +1.202.361.3040
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html