[ga] Re: Challenge

["Alejandro Pisanty - DGSCA y FQ, UNAM" <apisan@servidor.unam.mx>]

Danny,

thanks for expressing your distrust so openly.

The "data" you request are on the Committee website. Further, I have
personally asked for other providers of input, like this GA, to make their
positions known publicly there. That way, any panel you convene will have
the same input that we do. I hope they have all the other ingredients it
takes.

Yours,

Alejandro Pisanty


.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Director General de Servicios de Computo Academico
UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
Tel. (+52-55) 5622-8541, 5622-8542 Fax 5550-8405
http://www.dgsca.unam.mx
*
** 10 Aniversario de Internet Society - www.inet2002.org en Washington, DC
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, www.isoc.org
 Participa en ICANN, www.icann.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .



On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Alejandro,
>
> By making particular mention in your Interim Report of the Heathrow
> Declaration (which in my view is neither an extensive nor in-depth proposal
> and only parrots the Lynn Plan), and by citing the Amsterdam meeting which
> went exhaustively into a fresh analysis of S. Lynn’s reform proposal, you are
> creating the impression that the Board Committee on Evolution and Reform will
> once again be renamed to the ICANN Board Committee to Implement the Lynn Plan.
>
> Your recent comments in the last Names Council teleconference tend to add to
> this perception.  My concern is whether a Committee that is solely populated
> by Board members can *objectively* prepare any recommendations that are not
> in keeping with the already tendered proposals of your fellow Board member
> and CEO, Stuart Lynn.
>
> I would be willing to bet that an Independant Panel looking at the very same
> raw input that your Committee has received might well come up with a
> different set of viable recommendations.  In the spirit of fairness and for
> the sake of guaranteed objectivity, would you be willing to allow another
> Panel to review the same data, and to issue it's own independent conclusions
> for consideration by the ICANN Board?
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html