<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Motion asking for GA poll on rebid of ICANN contract
Sorry, Joanna, but an issue of this importance requires much more than
2 weeks worth of consideration.
Thursday, May 02, 2002, 6:11:34 PM, Joanna Lane wrote:
> Proposed Time Line.
> The following table sets out what is believed to be a reasonable guideline
> as to the timing of the various events that need to take place in order for
> the whole Assembly to vote on this issue within a 10 day period . What
> follows are not strict "rules" but rather a rough sketch of the rates at
> which Members could expect things to happen. That is, the "duration" is not
> carved in stone, but rather what one should expect to see, all other things
> being equal. Given the requirement for a Vote to take place within 10
> days, more than one process must take place at once, hence this table
> provides deadlines for each of the concurrent processes.
> Action Duration
> Commencing Closing
> Recognition of Proposal Thursday
> May 2nd
> Poll 3 days
> Friday May 2nd Sunday May 5th
> General Discussion 3 days Friday May
> 2nd Sunday May 5th
> Debate on wording of Motion 3 days Friday May 3rd
> Sunday May 5th
> Recognition of Motion * 24 hours Monday May
> 6th
> Vote of the Assembly 5 days Tuesday
> May 7th Saturday May 11th
> Final Report 24 hours Sunday
> May 12th
> * This assumes the the form of wording is agreeable without the need for a
> further Poll,
> and that the DNSO Secretariat needs no more than 24 hours notice to send
> Ballots to the Assembly.
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|