Re: [ga] Motion asking for GA poll on rebid of ICANN contract

[DPF <david@farrar.com>]

On Fri, 3 May 2002 11:38:20 -0700, William X Walsh
<william@wxsoft.info> wrote:

>Friday, May 03, 2002, 11:24:21 AM, DPF wrote:
>
>> So if they are willing to do that to the ALSC what makes you think the
>> GA has ever a sherrick of influence?  I used to think it could have
>> some influence but the Accra resolutions of the Board where they
>> ignored the ALSC, the Names Council, Taskforces and in fact everyone
>> except their own staff has changed my view.
>
>So we give up any hope of future influence by validating their
>criticisms?
>
>Not I.

I believe that any future influence would be so small and
insignificant that the preferred course is to get DOC to rebid the
contract.  ICANN have miserably failed to meet the MOU so why should
they get to keep the job?

Cheers


DPF
--
david@farrar.com
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html