<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Point of Order
William X Walsh wrote:
>Wednesday, May 08, 2002, 9:22:34 AM, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
>
>>William X Walsh wrote:
>>
>
>>>Wednesday, May 08, 2002, 9:10:42 AM, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
>>>
>>>>Fact: None of the above precludes the GA's ability to propose and vote
>>>>on what it will, including a re-bid. You'll have to do better than
>>>>this, I'm afraid.
>>>>
>>>It most certainly does, Sotiris. You are just so dead set on killing
>>>the GA and trying to use it to embarrass ICANN in order to get some
>>>anti-ICANN media coverage for this issue, that you refuse to see the
>>>obvious.
>>>
>>Wrong, wrong, wrong William. And, for the record: I don't think the
>>upcoming re-bid vote will kill the GA, nor will it embarass ICANN. If
>>
>
>You don't think....nice argument. Others have shown clearly exactly
>why it is most likely to do so, and that's the best you can come back
>with? "I don't think" ?
>
>Do you have anything to back that up?
>
>But again, it is all irrelevant, this motion is out of order.
>
The only thing out of order is you, Mr. Walsh. You've used up your 5
posts for today and this one was your sixth! (I'm also over the limit y
this one email, but it's administrative so don't get all worked up) ;-)
Sincerely,
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|