RE: [ga] reform proposal

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Marilyn,

I must assume, that; Jeff speaks for his group, Ross speaks for his, Jamie 
for his, and so on.  What I would like to know is what your group thinks on 
these issues.  A bunch of stock in the IT area is going in the ----can.

Do you think that reform here can help?
Wouldn't a rebid bolster and breed some new confidence?
Reliability and Stability of the Net help, but perceptions are actually more 
important.  Can your group help here?
IPv4 is clearly a toy.  Is AT&T hooked up with the China Movement, away from 
ICANN and the few year old experiment?
What is your companys' reason for supporting ICANN in that technology has 
passed them by, by at least two years?

Can you be candid on these issues which are at the crux of your questions?
What is your company doing to route around the problems caused by the DoC?

Answers to these questions would help discussion and lead us dotcommoners to 
a better understanding.

Sincerely,
Eric

> Kristy and others,
> 
> I would welcome hearing from the GA as Kristy suggests -- the recently
> released papers from the Evolution and Reform Committee offer a new
> opportunity for input. Can the GA develop comments for the questions
> raised by those papers, even if it is only some of the questions?  
> 
> 
> I know time is short for everyone. 
> 
> Marilyn
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kristy McKee [mailto:k@widgital.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:30 PM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: [ga] reform proposal
> 
> 
> 
> Folks, if we are really considering this proposal, why don't we start
> by  listing all the processes we want to change or list what we want? 
> How will  the decision makers know who to choose if we don't
> communicate what we want?
> 
> For example, if you want Ben and Jerry's New York Super Fudge Chunk ice
>  cream, don't tell me you are tired of chocolate yogurt and want me to
> get  you something else in the genre of ice cream.  Tell me you want
> Ben and  Jerry's New York Super Fudge Chunk ice cream.  In reference to
> ICANN, let's  be specific about what we WANT, in addition to letting
> them know why we  don't want ICANN.
> 
> Our Names Council is discussing this topic and has requested our input.
>  I  am willing to set aside some time to help come up with a response
> for them  to ponder and perhaps include in their findings/report.  I
> would think  those who are sincere would also volunteer to participate
> in such a  group.  We even have an extra publicly archived mail list we
> could use to  move the process/work to another location, one without a
> five post limit.
> 
> 
> :)
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html


http://www.Hi-Tek.com
Reality in a Digital World

The information transmitted in this e-mail is intended for the person or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material.  Any review, retransmission or other use of, or
taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited.  If
you receive this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete
this material from any system.  Thank you!


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html