Re: [ga] Motion # 1
To Ross and everyone else who has weighed in on this: we are now in the debate/discussion stage, and I don't see that there will be any rush to a vote. Having a "#1" implies that there might well be a "#2" and so on. Any of us is free either to propose a "#2," or suggest an amendment to the present #1, or whatever seems to be necessary. That's how this bit is supposed to work. My own bent here, as soon as I get the time to do it, is to lay out a "Bill of Particulars" that would put more meat into Joanna's "whereas" clauses, so we'll see how that goes. ICANN is not going away, and some concerted effort by all of us on this will show ICANN that neither are we. The object of all this work will be to generate, we hope, a single motion that everyone will agree is the one that ought to be taken to a vote. In the process of generating that motion, the actual merits will undoubtedly need to be bandied about, especially to include some of the excellent suggestions that have been made as to defining, up front, the actual purpose of the motion, but we might bear in mind that all we are doing at present is generating the best possible motion; we are not at present doing any voting on it. :-) Bill Lovell Ross Wm. Rader wrote: 01c701c1f832$d0cc2ea0$040a000a@RRADER2K">I am firmly against taking this motion to a vote.
|