Re: [ga] other approaches and concerns

["Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>]

We are certainly going out of our way to make new people welcome, aren't
we?

Meanwhile the committee on icann Board independence (spelled "reform") is
busy giving us the slightly modified Lynn Plan.

On Fri, 10 May 2002, Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> The problem is: what will happen after the vote?
> Will the people that showed interest in the GA disappear as magically as 
> they appeared, at the rate of 14% every 4 days? Or, once turned the page, 
> for bad or good, could we concentrate on Domain-Name-System-related issues?
> I trust Jamie in doing this. I trust much less the herds of followers.
> This is why I talk about "suicide of the GA". Folks, we risk to spend the 
> most valuable time, the month before an ICANN meeting, debating things that, 
> albeit important, are not in our mission.

-- 
		Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                        -->It's hot here.<--

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html