[ga] vote? to Vote?

[eric@hi-tek.com]

I still do not get this idea of voting so that we may vote.

I actually have been very impressed and persuaded by some of the
arguments against rebidding.

But I have not seen a single good argument against having a vote.

If I take a combination of Jamie, WXW, Flemming and TR I almost think
that a rebid would be bad.

It would seem that letting ICANN remain the pitiful disaster that Lynn
describes and routing around them, except for entertainment, is a
logical alternative plan.

If we could somehow adopt a combination of an ISOC model with the newly
forming Online Voting Republic to assure users representation and
professional guidance, I do not think we need to worry about ICANN.

One thing is for certain they (icann) have provided us with very good
forums, some horribly censored and some not. And so we are making the
next move on civilizing a frontier.  Communication and democratic voting
mechanisms.  Consensus was good for you wild cowboys three years ago but
now we can vote.

Worry about fraud and the like is Crispin inspired dog dodo.  It is like
he sticks this virus out there so you have to buy into his hot load on
the road, thereby keeping his board squatters in place.

Lets vote so we can get a marketing survey and figure out which way to
go.

God Bless and all of my love to all mothers out there on this US centric
day for celebrating your great contributions to children from 0 to
infinity.  Thank you.

Eric

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html