[ga] Basic outline of the voting process

[DNSO Secretariat <DNSO.secretariat@dnso.org>]

[announce@dnso.org]
[voters@dnso.org]

ICANN/DNSO

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           DNSO General Assembly
                     Basic outline of the voting process
                    b12, Two motions about ICANN Reform

14 May 2002

BASIC OUTLINE OF THE VOTING PROCESS, b12, Two motions about ICANN Reform

1. A ballot is prepared.

   A ballot starts with line "BEGIN" and ends with line "END__".

   It is like this:

    BEGIN:b12:KabcdZ:FirstName_LastName:email@address.somewhere:SVP-reply
    b12:KabcdZ:[ ] I vote FOR Motion 1 ("Request to US DoC")
    b12:KabcdZ:[ ] I vote AGAINST Motion 1
    b12:KabcdZ:[ ] I ABSTAIN regarding Motion 1
    b12:KabcdZ:[ ] I vote FOR Motion 2 ("Reform principles")
    b12:KabcdZ:[ ] I vote AGAINST Motion 2
    b12:KabcdZ:[ ] I ABSTAIN regarding Motion 2
    END__:b12:KabcdZ:FirstName_LastName:email@address.somewhere:SVP-reply

   Motion 1. "Request that US DoC hold open competition
              for services now offered by ICANN"
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------

   WHEREAS the Internet Corporation for Assigned names and Numbers (ICANN) has
   dramatically changed the initial terms of reference for ICANN, and is
   proposing even further changes.

   WHEREAS these proposed changes have met extensive opposition in the Internet
   community and go even further from the original terms of reference.

   WHEREAS a new open competition would allow the U.S. Department of Commerce
   (the DoC) to consider both the ICANN Board proposal for restructuring, and
   alternatives offered by others for managing key Internet resources, while
   providing for a public record of the process for enhanced visibility.

   WHEREAS the General Assembly of ICANN's Domain name Supporting Organization
   (the DNSO) also reminds the DoC, that in the Green and the White Paper, the
   Government of the United States made it clear that it intends to withdraw
   from management of the Domain name System (the DNS).

   It is hereby RESOLVED that:-

   The General Assembly of the Domain name Supporting Organization of Internet
   Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) asks the US Department of
   Commerce to have an open competition for the services now provided by ICANN,
   provided that the new competition would address the need to develop an
   international framework for DNS management. An open competition should aim
   to achieve comprehensive privatization and internationalization of DNS
   services, consistent with the need for stability, but also innovation,
   competition and freedom.

   Motion 2. "Basic principles for the ICANN Reform Process"
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Whereas there are certain basic principles which have to be honored
           by an entity coordinating key Internet resources in order to
           gain the trust of the Internet community,

   Whereas these principles include transparent process, broad input into
           policy-making, which must include meaningful individual
           and non-commercial participation, and accountability (including
           independent review of decisions),

   Whereas there is a widespread perception that ICANN is moving away
           from these principles, in particular by stalling or abandoning
           processes for the implementation of an independent review
           system and for participation of the Internet community at
           large in ICANN oversight,

   the General Assembly of the DNSO reminds the ICANN Board that it must
   adhere to these principles in any reform proposal and make it
   sufficiently known how proposed reforms provide improvements regarding
   these principles. Should the ICANN reform process fail to provide
   significant improvements in these regards, it is the international
   Internet community's and governments' task to consider how all of or
   parts of ICANN's responsibilities could be transferred smoothly to one
   or more new or existing organizations which are accountable to the
   international Internet community as a whole, have clearly defined
   missions and are not only under the sole control of a national
   department of commerce, without endangering the stability of the DNS
   or the Internet as a whole. In the meantime, all groups of the Internet
   community are called to deliver their input on reforms needed.
   -----------------------------------------------------------------------

2. The ballot is assigned a number (first field in a line), here "b12" --
   ballot number 12 (it is the twelfth ballot submitted to the GA vote
   since January 2000).

3. The ballot is personalised. Each line indicates who is voting.

4. The second field, here between "b12" and "FirstName_LastName", indicate
   a personalised code given for this ballot to this person. A
   personalised code is 6 characters, starting with "K", ending with "Z",
   here "KabcdZ".

5. Do not edit the ballot. Just put an "X" between square brackets [ ] if
   you give your vote to a statement written in a line.

   You have two votes, no more. You can vote for or against both motions,
   you can vote against one and for the other, you can abstain on either
   or both.

6. The ballot will arrive From: "gavote@dnso.org" -- please reply without
   CC to any list.

7. You will receive an acknowledgement of your ballot within 48 hours.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Information from:  ) DNSO GA's Chair
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html