RE: [ga] Procedure.

["Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>]

|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: owner-ga-full@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga-full@dnso.org] 
|> On Behalf Of Jeff Williams
|> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:18 AM
|> To: dassa@dhs.org
|> Cc: ga@dnso.org
|> Subject: Re: [ga] Procedure.

|>   The DNSO GA is supposed to advise the ICANN BoD on issues
|> that relate to DNS or the relationship that the DNSO has with
|> stakeholders as it pertains to stakeholder/user interests.  Hence
|> it is fitting, proper as well as required for the GA to take such
|> a vote on a rebid situation if the GA members believe that such
|> a motion or resolution is necessary and/or desired so as to
|> inform the ICANN BoD and staff adequately...

I don't normally respond to Jeff Williams posts but as this is topical I
will for this instance.

The statement above highlights the problems I have with the first
motion.  The motion does not and is not intended to inform the ICANN
Board or staff as to anything.  It is directed at an external body and
bypasses the internal processes. 

As such I believe it is out of order for this Assembly and can not
support it.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html