Re: [ga] NC BS

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 04:28 p.m. 15/05/2002 -0400, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
>that would mean....none of us, right?

If "us" means "parties not fitting in the stakeholder scheme" (the term use 
by the NC) then all we may expect from this NC is some much resisted 
"public consultation".

Still continued foot-dragging about the recognition of an Individuals' 
constituency, "forming in accordance to criteria... (hrumpf, mumble) " that 
are of course still not coming forth from the task force, never mind that 
the current constituencies have not "formed" in accordance to any such 
criteria.

My respect for those NC members who are speaking out about how unfair this 
foot dragging is to all involved.

My MP3 player had a sense of humour.   Artist: dnsosansfilet.

--Joop

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html