Re: [ga] Re: Individual Stakeholders Constituency

[Marc Schneiders <marc@fuchsia.bijt.net>]

On Fri, 17 May 2002, at 14:09 [=GMT-0700], William X Walsh wrote:

> What Joe is advocating, as well as others who see a threat to their
> ability to control ICANN if it was truly open to the entire internet
> community, is a structure that allows public participation via ONE
> single vehicle inside the process, that makes it easier for them to
> control, manipulate, or discount.
>
> In fact what needs to happen is for there to be public participation
> in EVERY organ of ICANN, from the election of Board members to the
> SO's to the Task Forces, to the Working Groups.
>
> And this scares them, because then they cannot control it and they
> find the ability to manipulate outcomes would be grossly impaired.

May we go one step further? What we need it an organization separate from
ICANN, very willing to co-operate with(in) ICANN, but unwilling to be put
on side tracks time and again.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html