<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: Membership criteria - compromise
Jefsey <jefsey@club-internet.fr> wrote:
>
> It would even permit very quick responses: a stuffing could lead to a quick
> verification vote. A 95% poll supported by a 75% votes would really mean
> the GA really supports something. While a 90% poll supported by a 45%
> vote would mean hi-jacking attempt and kill the reputation of the stuffers
> and the enthousiam of their supporters.
>
Jefsey,
Your numbers suppose that such a high participation happens
and is possible.
I made a summary of participation in all 11 (12 soon) GA votes,
it is in http://www.dnso.org/secretariat/gavotesummary.html
(access from Administration Documents of the GA).
On average we get 26%.
Ballot and Date Electorate Votes Participation
---------------------------------------------------------
b01 26 June 2000 117 61 52.1%
b02 6-17 November 2000 252 56 22.2%
b03 16-23 March 2001 295 67 22.7%
b04 31 March - 7 April 2001 293 102 34.8%
b05 21-28 May 2001 305 91 29.8%
b06 24 Jun - 11 Jul 2001 326 81 24.8%
b07 5-25 Jul 2001 333 73 21.9%
b08 17-31 Aug 2001 440 89 20.2%
b09 22-29 Oct 2001 447 128 28.6%
b10 14 Dec 2001 - 11 Jan 2002 456 114 25.0%
b11 23 Nov 2001 - 14 Jan 2002 442 102 23.1%
b12 15-22 May 2002 586 NNN NN.N%
---------------------------------------------------------
Elisabeth Porteneuve
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|