<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Re: [voters] RESULTS: Vote on Two motions about ICANN Reform, May 2002
- To: <ga@dnso.org>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Re: [voters] RESULTS: Vote on Two motions about ICANN Reform, May 2002
- From: "Dassa" <dassa@dhs.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 13:20:40 +1000
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <001f01c202e8$04ce6aa0$4754fc3e@r6yll>
- Organization: DHS International
- Reply-To: <dassa@dhs.org>
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: owner-ga-full@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga-full@dnso.org]
|> On Behalf Of Richard Henderson
|> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 3:58 PM
|> To: DNSO Secretariat; voters@dnso.org; ga-full@dnso.org
|> Cc: ga@dnso.org; halloran@icann.org
|> Subject: [ga] Re: [voters] RESULTS: Vote on Two motions
|> about ICANN Reform, May 2002
|>
|>
|> So - a clear majority of voters (67%) want the DoC to
|> initiate a rebid for
|> the role currently carried out by ICANN.
|>
|> And - if you soften the criticism a little, you can raise
|> that to 75%.
This can not be assumed.
|> But you don't actually need Motion 2, because a majority of
|> nearly 7 out of
|> 10 want ICANN's position to be radically challenged by DoC.
Totally false. The higher level of support for Motion 2 raises the
question as to Motion 1 being appropriate.
|> Good vote. Thanks to everyone who cared enough to vote.
|>
|> Will the leadership of ICANN please respond? (Or preferably,
|> just GO!)
Not a helpful comment.
<snip>
Darryl (Dassa) Lynch.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|