Re: [ga] Re: Transfers: Apparent Authority Discussion

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

Ross,

to label the auDA solution that effectively protects the registrant community 
from abusive transfer practices as "silly" is less-than-constructive.  Is 
there any reason that you can't build upon their initiative in a manner which 
adds to their "tree-bark" approach?   You have already indicated that the FOA 
may take either a physical or electronic form and that IDRX processes should 
be automated.  To minimize the risk to the registrant that automated 
processes can pose, why not proceed along the lines of auDA's domain name PIN 
approach as a verification tool?   Are there any reasons that you have for 
objecting to this approach?

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html