Re: [ga] Re: Transfers: Apparent Authority Discussion

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

Marilyn,

You refuse to allow members of the DNSO to post directly to the Task Force 
list.  Perhaps you could explain why we should support this elitist and 
foolhardy approach?  Most of us signed onto the efforts of the DNSO so that 
we could cooperate in the pursuit of solving domain name problems.  Your 
exclude-99%-of-the-membership methodology does not lend itself to a full 
discussion of the issues, and even most of your task force members haven't 
bothered to participate in this sham.  

You've been at this project for half a year.  What have you accomplished with 
such limited input so far?  All you've succeeded in doing is wasting our time 
and failing to achieve results.  Your interim report after half a year of 
work is pathetic, and registrants continue to suffer from abusive registrar 
transfer processes while you play at your stupid exclusionary games.  

If your process had any merit you would have achieved results and policy 
recommendations long before now.  Six months have been wasted, and I hold you 
accountable.

PS.  If you required a definition of apparent authority and express 
authorization, you probably should have started by asking the author of the 
contract (presumably Louis Touton, JDRP, and staff) to provide the 
definition.  
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html