[ga] Re: Dan Halloran's Continuing Silence

[vint cerf <vinton.g.cerf@wcom.com>]

Richard that's not entirely accurate - I have responded.
but I do not have specific answers to your questions.

vint

At 01:43 AM 5/27/2002 +0100, Richard Henderson wrote:
>FIFTEEN DAYS ago I sent a personal message to ICANN's Dan Halloran, requesting that he answer the detail of 14 specific questions, which covered matters of sincere concern.
> 
>I also posted the 14 questions at ICANNWatch (see link: <http://icannwatch.com/article.php?sid=735>http://icannwatch.com/article.php?sid=735 ) and on public mailing-lists.
> 
>Dan Halloran has STILL not even acknowledged receipt of my mail.
> 
>Is this the openness and responsiveness we should expect from an organisation which serves the whole world?
> 
>I believe that ICANN does not want to answer awkward questions and is therefore consciously evading them.
> 
>I will continue to publicly request Dan Halloran to reply. As some of the issues have implications for the imminent .info LR2, I take the view that it is irresponsible and inexcusable of ICANN to ignore a serious and reasoned letter like this.
> 
>I welcome any supporting (or alternative) views. Unlike ICANN, I'm not afraid of dialogue.
> 
>Richard Henderson
><http://www.theinternetchallenge/>www.theInternetChallenge 
>        
>PS I have also copied Vint Cerf and Stuart Lynn but neither of them have replied either. Has the whole of the ICANN leadership been sucked down a black hole? Are my questions really so frightening that they dare not answer ANY of them? And dare not even acknowledge their receipt? Openness.... ?????

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html