Re: [ga] Election debate?

[DPF <david@farrar.com>]

On Tue, 28 May 2002 15:31:43 EDT, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

>David writes:  The main reason against the elections seems to be variants on 
>we can't make them 100% fraud free. 
>
>That's just the ICANN spin... the real reason against elections is that we 
>would be electing ICANN's most vocal critics.  ICANN incumbents don't want 
>half the Board populated with the likes of Karl and Andy.  It's that simple.

Oh I agree.  I was trying to make the point that the  "official"
stated reason is one which could apply to any country or large
organisation in the world almost.

DPF
--
david@farrar.com
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html