<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] your comments
Joe writes: Today, many people marginalize themselves by taking a black or
white approach -- e.g., direct elections are the only acceptable way to be
accountable.
With all due respect, the question that one might ask is the following:
After having budgeted $450,000 for an At-Large study, and after having been
told by those charged with completing the year-long study (this included the
former Chairman of ICANN), that "an At-Large membership registration and
election process can be developed that meets standards of integrity, fairness
and affordability" ( http://www.atlargestudy.org/final_report.shtml ), why
has the Board not accepted the recommendations of its own Blue-Ribbon panel
that reflects the consensus view of the community?
Aren't we a consensus-based organization? Do we now have a Board that no
longer respects consensus?
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|