<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] your comments
Indeed, having a public election of any type would greatly decrease the
chances for big business to hand pick our elected directors: I see your
point. It would be a disaster for the ICANN to have to include
knowledgeable or experienced folks, better to have people so far up the
corporate butt that they haven't got a clue about new technology or what it
means to be a decent, fair person.
Good for you Joe.
~k
At 08:14 AM 5/30/2002 -0400, Joe Sims wrote:
>
>
> Laying blame is certainly not a productive use of our
> time,
> but if we're going to go down that road, I'm more inclined to lay the
> fault
> for not getting ICANN 'fully formed' at your
> doorstep.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Suit yourself. But you may remember that the Board was set to adopt an
>election plan for 9 At Large Directors in Cairo, which would have called
>for direct election of an 18-member AL council that would then have elected
>9 AL Board members. The global democrary advocates killed this, because
>it did not involve direct elections of the Board members themselves. Go
>back and read the CDT/Common Cause/Carter Center report, explaining why
>this was unacceptable and an outrage to even consider. Their position
>(unlike that of those who opposed all elections but were willing to live
>with this compromise) was "my way or else," and the fact that lots of other
>people thought their way was unworkable was apparently irrelevant to them,
>because they just knew they were on the side of right, truth and justice.
>As it turns out, this turn of events was fortunate, since we have now seen
>what a mess global on-line elections would be, but do you suppose there are
>any second thoughts by those who let their unwillingness to compromise lead
>them down a path to (from their perspective) total failure? Just a
>thought.
>
>
>Joe Sims
>Jones Day Reavis & Pogue
>51 Louisiana Avenue NW
>Washington, D.C. 20001
>Direct Phone: 1.202.879.3863
>Direct Fax: 1.202.626.1747
>Mobile Phone: 1.703.629.3963
>
>==========
>The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains
>information that may be confidential, be protected by the attorney-client
>or other applicable privileges, or constitute non-public information. It
>is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are
>not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by
>replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use,
>dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this message by unintended
>recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>==========
>
>
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|