<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] GA
Philip,
Same subject (misrepresentation), different point.
I notice when reading the NC meeting notes that comments made by Thomas or
Alexander are included in the notes; however their presence at the meeting
is not recognized by whomever takes role call.
I am identifying this as a PROBLEM with your book-keeping and wonder who
else is invited to these meetings, attends and is not included in the role
call portion of the minutes.
It is disrespectful to the DNSO as a whole to not provide correct
information about who attended what.
Is there a specific reason why the GA Chair and Alt Chair are not included
in the attendance roster?
Thanks,
~k
At 04:28 PM 5/31/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>Thomas,
>I do believe there is a degree of suicidal misinterpretation of the
>current NC recommendations.
>
>
>The chair and alt-chair of the GA have been invited by the Names Council
>to participate in discussions in ICANN evolution. That invitation stands.
>Your perspectives are learned, reasoned and valued. Today you represent
>the dual role of today's GA.
>
>
>The NC has not said it wants to disenfranchise anyone. It has redefined
>the role of the general assembly as being the meeting point for
>stakeholders. The GA envisaged is not intended to fulfil the existing dual
>role of today's GA.
>
>
>The argument should be - who are the stakeholders? Agree on them, and once
>they self-organise get them round the table and in the new DNSO and new GA.
>
>
>So, the question remains, how can individual opinion not so
>self-organised be factored into decision making ?
>Is there something desirable about today's GA and the respect it receives
>in trying to do this?
>Is there possibly a better means of factoring in individual opinion?
>The NC recommendation tries to address this.
>
>Philip
>
>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ga] GA
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
- References:
- [ga] GA
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|