Re: [ga] i just sent the following to south africa

["L. Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>]

POSSR is a domain registration system, not a rootzone.  That would be 
applicable to any registration system in any TLD in any root.  I have no 
idea why you would bring that up here.  Also, my understanding is that he 
was one of the programmers and was not the finishing programmer.  However, 
I am not certain of those facts.  In any case it is not pertinent to the 
discussion of traffic monitoring and roots.  Why you continue to single 
out one entity is beyond me, other than an ongoing personal dislike for an 
individual.  I wish you would stop this line of posting and stay with the 
subject matter.  If you do not like pacroot (the rootzone), then don't use 
it.  There are other choices - the point I was making.

Leah


On 11 Jun 2002, at 11:07, Joop Teernstra wrote:

> At 11:54 a.m. 10/06/2002 -0400, L. Gallegos wrote:
> >Hmmmm, perhaps that is why choice is good, Joop, although I can't think of
> >a reason why pacroot would want to monitor traffic in the manner to which
> >Joe refers.
> 
> Leah,
> 
> I agree that in general choice is good and that single points of failure
> should be avoided, but my whole point was that the choice should always be
> an *informed* choice.
> 
> Awareness of the fact that William X. Walsh contracted to write the 
> software (POSSR2) for pacificroot , but maintains in public that he opposes
> "alternate" roots and wants their very discussion off limits here should
> help make people their informed choices.
> 
> --Joop
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html