Re: [ga] Blueprint to purge the critics

[William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>]

Friday, June 21, 2002, 11:08:51 AM, James Love wrote:

> Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>> Well, I believe that the GA should be able to take votes on matters 
>> relevant to its mission and matters relevant to its internal functioning.
>> For instance, should be able to elect its chair.
>> If the GA starts becoming a body whose main purpose is to vote motions, 
>> moreover addressed at bodies outside ICANN, like in the recent past, the 
>> results are before our eyes.

>      Which means what?  You agree that the GA should not record opinions if 
> that offends the ICANN board?

It has nothing to do with what the ICANN Board thinks of the opinion,
Jamie, and you damn well know it.

It's about subjects being GERMANE to the GA's tasks and missions, the
GA is not some open association, it is an assembly with a specific
purpose.

I know that limits the ability of leaders of lobbyist organizations
like you to abuse their influence to try and get results that back up
their outside efforts, but it's a simple fact.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!  
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html