<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] GA on new Blueprint for changes in GA
Thomas and all assembly members,
Having votes on Motions/resolutions regarding or dealing with
specific or even broad issues are not problematic at all in any
General Assembly. It is the leadership that can and with the
DNSO GA, has tried to make voting on issues, look
problematic..
Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2002-06-26 11:08:53 -0400, KathrynKL@aol.com wrote:
>
> > I believe that ICANN's elimination of the GA's tools
> > (strawpolls) and voice is so fundamentally wrong that it is
> > grounds in itself for the rebid of ICANN. kathy kleiman
>
> It's a long way from straw polls to votes. The latter is what's
> problematic on the GA, for reasons I have pointed out before.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|